SOMPO × ASPEN$3.5B
GALLAGHER × ASSUREDPARTNERS$13.4B
P&C COMBINED RATIO~99%
MEDIAN CARRIER ROE~11%
BAIN × LINCOLN FINANCIAL$825M / 9.9%
HIPPO HOME LOSS RATIO121%
ASPEN IPO · AHL$2.76B
STATE FARM CA RATE+17%
SOMPO × ASPEN$3.5B
GALLAGHER × ASSUREDPARTNERS$13.4B
P&C COMBINED RATIO~99%
MEDIAN CARRIER ROE~11%
BAIN × LINCOLN FINANCIAL$825M / 9.9%
HIPPO HOME LOSS RATIO121%
ASPEN IPO · AHL$2.76B
STATE FARM CA RATE+17%
Skip to main content

Hippo, Root and Lemonade: the insurtech loss ledger

Three quarters, three different stories — and one shared question: how many of the original insurtech cohort actually get to underwriting profitability.

Tyler Schapiro, CFA, CPAMay 24, 20256 min read
121%
HIPPO HOME LOSS RATIO

Hippo's 121% home loss ratio underscores how punishing the Sunbelt homeowners market is for anyone without geographic diversification and hard reinsurance. A $48M quarterly net loss on that book is not a surprise; it is the math.

Root's numbers are the most encouraging of the three. A 96% combined ratio and 24% premium growth suggests the telematics-priced auto book is finally scaling into its cost structure.

Lemonade crossed $1B in in-force premium — a real milestone — but the $62.4M net loss shows the underlying unit economics still need work. The bull case is that scale eventually flips the model; the bear case is that scale just increases the loss.

Byline
Tyler Schapiro, CFA, CPA

Founder of Owning Risk. Independent research on the business of insurance and the flow of risk capital.